You people know how i feel about Call of Duty. I think it's taking over the world and that their are better and more intelligent games, such as Bioshock and Mass Effect 2. But I recently replayed the Modern Warfare 2 campaign and I have a new opinion. I think that it is stupid that it's taking over the game space, but they aren't bad games. Not at all.
So I have something to say about the Cod vs. Battlefield debate.
This November, two of the biggest shooters are going head to head. It's like Bears vs. Packers, Texas vs. Oklahoma, Coke vs. Pepsi. It's gonna be a western type showdown. At least that's what everybody thinks.
But in my opinon there willl be no real clear winner. Modern Warfare 3 will more than likely be higher in sales than battlefield, because of the extremely high number of COD players. But Battlefield won't be too far behind. There will be no clear winner. There's a couple of rivalry examples I can bring in. They are Coke vs Pepsi and Dell vs Apple. People may prefer one over the other, but neither will ever lose. I think that as long as both are quality games and are fun to play, they will both win. My money is going to go towards modern warfate but that is only because i have only played COD and i really like the modern warfare characters. But I will get Battlefield off of gamefly so i will play both.
In the end, I really hope that they are both good games and that they have great stories. Not that I can say that one is better than the other and know that it's true.
No comments:
Post a Comment